DOG KENNEL HILL PROJECT |
|
|
Nationality: British Email: Click here to contact Website: Click here to visit Address: n/a |
Dog Kennel Hill project is a collective of dance/performance makers and artists, Ben Ash, Henrietta Hale and Rachel Lopez de la Nieta. with foundations in movement practices. Their current research area lies within the persistent exploration of the themes of tension & crisis. It involves a process that begins with curiosity, sociological research and celebrations of difference stances. It draws to a point of refinement and distillation, bordering on abstraction without losing humour or humanity.
World Premieres of Plays by Dog Kennel Hill Project
Charlie Ashwell, Jim Barnard, Joan Cleville, Henrietta Hale and Erik Nevin | Choreography of an Argument Round a Table | |
| 1st Produced: | 42122 | |||||
Organisations: | Dog Kennel Hill Project | |||||
| 1st Published: | I don't think it has been published. Try emailing Playwright or Agent where listed at top of page. | ISBN/ASIN: | - | |||
| Music: | - | doollee no | #169146 | |||
To Buy This Play: | If Publisher (above) is underlined then the play may be purchased by direct click from the Publisher, otherwise (below) are AbeBooks for secondhand, signed & 1st eds and other Booksellers for new copies | |||||
|
| ||||||
Genre: | piece | |||||
| Parts: | Male | 3 | Female | 2 | ||
Parts other: | pianist | |||||
Notes: | Devised and performed by Charlie Ashwell, Jim Barnard, Joan Cleville, Henrietta Hale and Erik Nevin | |||||
Synopsis: | 6 people and a piano create a surprising and riotous choreographed physical performance investigating what it is to be in an argument and how we win and lose while our trousers are down. Dealing with confrontation and power struggles in an absurdist situation, the setting could be a pub, UN Security Council or a family dinner party. Performers appropriate provocative actions, interactions and statements as they negotiate within a tight, rhythmical and layered structure of language and movement. Images offer insights on the absurdities of political stances, power, manipulation and confrontation as well as looking at the pure energetic qualities of emotional relationships and attachments to self and belief. | |||||
Further Reference: | - | |||||
|
